Nine tenths of UK officials say working life is getting worse, survey finds
Some 90% of UK civil servants say that their working lives are deteriorating, new research by Global Government Forum has found, and two thirds say their power and influence is waning compared to that of politicians.
In an online survey that closed last month, GGF asked respondents: ‘Is life as a UK civil servant improving or declining?’ The survey attracted 1078 respondents – 346 of them from the Senior Civil Service and grades 6 and 7, which sit just below director level – and just 2.4% said that working life in the civil service was improving. Perceptions were still worse amongst senior ranks, with 91% saying working life was deteriorating compared to 89.5% across the whole sample.
Officials were particularly unhappy in the Department of Health and the Ministry of Defence, where 96.9% and 94.1% respectively said working life was deteriorating. In the health department, no respondents said it was improving; in the MOD, the proportion was 0.8%. In recent years both departments have undergone major administrative spending cuts and job losses, allied with major organisational change programmes.
Only 1.3% of respondents replied ‘don’t know’, with 6.8% saying working life was neither deteriorating nor improving.
Respondents were also asked: ‘In the UK would you say that the power and influence of civil servants is rising or falling, relative to that of national politicians?’ Only 3.9% said that civil servants are growing in power and 15% said the power balance remains in equilibrium, but 68.6% said that politicians are growing in power. The remaining 12.4% replied that they didn’t know.
During the 2010-15 Parliament, the then-Coalition government introduced a number of reforms giving politicians greater influence over top civil service and public appointments. These changes included permitting the prime minister to appoint new permanent secretaries from a list of people approved through the formal selection process, rather than simply having the option to veto a single recommended candidate.
The government also pushed for changes to the system for making public appointments, prompting outgoing commissioner for public appointments Sir David Normington to warn in an Independent article that the proposals “would enable Ministers to set their own rules; override those rules whenever they want; appoint their own selection panels; get preferential treatment for favoured candidates; ignore the panel’s advice if they don’t like it; and appoint someone considered by the panel as not up to the job.”
Again, there were some outliers in the responses to this question – with 73.9% of Home Office officials and 80.7% of MOD civil servants saying that politicians’ power is waxing relative to officials’, compared to the civil service average of 68.6%.
The Home Office was run between May 2010 and July 2016 by new prime minister Theresa May, who’s known for her close management of officials and her robust interactions with other departments.
Civil servants’ gloomy verdicts on their working lives are likely to be linked to the Coalition’s austerity programme, which resulted in 90,000 job cuts between 2010 and 2015. Following the Conservatives’ victory in the May 2015 general election, then-chancellor George Osborne signaled that up to 100,000 officials – nearly a quarter of the remaining workforce – could lose their jobs by 2020.
Following Theresa May’s appointment as prime minister in July, officials are awaiting the Treasury’s Autumn Statement on 23 November to find out whether the new administration intends to stick to Osborne’s spending plans.
For up to date government news and international best practice follow us on Twitter @globegov