US Capitol attack spurs data scientists to predict next insurrection using AI

Data scientists are working to develop AI modelling techniques that can predict outbreaks of political violence following an attack on the US Capitol Building in 2021.
A method of analysis known as ‘unrest prediction’ uses AI algorithms to anticipate political violence in a country, based on historic, economic, and democratic data trends. Unrest prediction tools can then flag potential hotspots for violence across a country, and potentially stop outbreaks before they occur.
CoupCast is one such tool based at the University of Central Florida, which last year said that of 42 national elections scheduled to occur in 2021, around 40% were at high risk of violence. In an article published by The Conversation last year, Clayton Besaw, an affiliated fellow at the university who also helps run CoupCast, said countries with “longer and more recent histories of election violence” were more likely to experience outbreaks of violence in future.
“In democracies, election violence can occur because of bitter partisan competition or as a result of political violence becoming normalised,” he said. “An incumbent leader who directly or indirectly encourages violence to suppress the opposition can also catalyse violence.”
[Read more: Challenges to US election are ‘anti-democratic’, says former Republican House Speaker]
CoupCast’s database tracks all incidents of political violence going as far back as 1975. These data show that 2020 was the worst year for political violence on its records, with 54% of national elections involved some form of violence. Prior to 2020, the worse year for civil unrest was 1990, where violence occurred in around 46% of elections.
Anticipating insurrection
CoupCast has been used previously to chart and predict political violence in developing countries, but its scientists are now starting to look more closely at its applicability in the US following the Capitol riots in Washington DC last January, in which five people died.
In a recent report by the Washington Post, Roudabeh Kishi, director of research and innovation at the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED), another project that looks at predicting political violence, said an attitude of “American exceptionalism” means US experts in unrest prediction have generally ignored the need to apply the method at home. “That needs to change,” she commented.
[Read more: Union demands action against US inspector general in telework spying row]
The report also included comments from Sheldon Himelfarb, chief executive of the conflict resolution non-profit PeaceTech. Himelfarb said that US experts turning their attentions inward would be needed to prevent events like 6 January 2021 from recurring. “For the 2024 election God knows we absolutely need to be doing this,” he said. PeaceTech is currently planning this year to relaunch Ground Truth, an initiative that similarly refocuses its resources on domestic affairs in the US to tackle violence linked to elections and other democratic public events.