Civil servants must make their views heard, says former UK minister
Senior officials, he said, “have loads of experience and knowledge” and should be be part of the strategic conversation.
While officials at the Treasury gave their views readily from the beginning, they were more hesitant to do so at DCSF, he said.
“It took me a long time to get the civil servants to say what we should do when I arrived at DCSF. I would say: ‘Whats the plan?’ and they would ask me what I wanted them to do.
“I said to them: ‘I don’t want you to tell me what you think I think. I want you to tell me what you think. And when we got there, it was great.”
Balls, who lost his parliamentary seat in last year’s general election after more than ten years as an MP, was speaking at a lecture he gave about his new book Speaking Out and the lessons he learned from his time in politics.
The event, which also featured former Treasury permanent secretary Sir Nicholas Macpherson, was organised by the Strand Group at King’s College London.
For up to date government news and international best practice follow us on Twitter @globegov
See also:
Women leaders top priority for UK’s incoming civil service commissioner
UK minister signals rethink on ‘guided distribution’ performance management
Lord O’Donnell, former Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service, UK: Exclusive Interview
Rupert McNeil, chief people officer for the UK Civil Service: exclusive interview
About Winnie Agbonlahor
Winnie is news editor of Global Government Forum. She previously reported for Civil Service World - the trade magazine for senior UK government officials. Originally from Germany, Winnie first came to the UK in 2006 to study a BA in Journalism & Russian at the University of Sheffield. She is bilingual in English and German, and, after spending an academic year abroad in Russia and reporting for the Moscow Times, Winnie also speaks Russian fluently.
Related Posts
One Comment
Leave a Reply
Sounds wrong to me. Someone needs to know what direction to go, and the team of people who stand to loose nothing whatsoever when they get this wrong, who are not KPI’d on paying any attention to anything outside their role, who have no constraints on cost, no incentive to create value, no obligation to share or help, and who practically never talk to their peers in the other departments, states, territories, councils, etc, and all with no accountability to the public, … that team, they are the *last* people who should be given any input on what should be done!
Maybe this is the lesson he failed to learn when he lost his seat? He should have known what to do, not asked the wrong people?