Figures reveal success of small nations

While larger countries naturally get most of the airtime, small developed countries have done disproportionately well over the last few decades.
How they continue this successful trend in a world of increasing globalisation is a question that has recently been addressed by David Skilling, in a discussion paper published by the Landfall Strategy Group.
In the paper, entitled ‘In Uncertain Seas : Positioning Small Countries to Success in a Changing World’, Skilling highlights facts that are often overlooked when the focus of global attention is on big blocs like China, the Eurozone, the USA and Russia.
He defines a small developed country as having a population of less than 20 million. Examples include Iceland, which has a population of just 330,000, Singapore, with 4.9 million, and Sweden and the Netherlands with 9.2 million and 16.6 million respectively.
Small countries are over-represented in per-capita income levels, Skilling notes. On that measure, seven of the top 10 countries in the world are small. Not only that, but out of the top five countries in the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report (2011/12) four were small developed countries – Switzerland, Singapore, Sweden and Finland. The USA was the fifth.
The advantages are not just across the economic sphere. On the UN Human Development Index, 14 of the top 20 advanced economies were small advanced countries. Using OECD data, for countries with the highest levels of life satisfaction, nine of the top 10 were small countries.
The data goes on, but the evidence is clear. Now, the focus is on whether such countries continue to attain such strong performance. Skilling says it depends upon their continued ability to adapt, which he thinks has kept them at the top so far.
To read the report in full, click here.